PATENTE TECAV\u00dcZ\u00dcN OLMADI\u011eININ TESP\u0130T\u0130 DAVASINDA YERGILAMA G\u0130DER\u0130 VE VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130<\/p>\n
Patente tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti davas\u0131, hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 6769 say\u0131l\u0131 S\u0131nai M\u00fclkiyet Kanununun 154. Maddesinden almaktad\u0131r. Madde;
\n\u201c(1) Menfaati olan herkes, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de giri\u015fti\u011fi veya giri\u015fece\u011fi ticari veya s\u0131nai faaliyetin ya da bu ama\u00e7la yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ciddi ve fiili giri\u015fimlerin s\u0131nai m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na tecav\u00fcz te\u015fkil edip etmedi\u011fi hususunda, hak sahibinden g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini bildirmesini talep edebilir. Bu talebin tebli\u011finden itibaren bir ay i\u00e7inde cevap verilmemesi veya verilen cevab\u0131n menfaat sahibi taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmemesi h\u00e2linde, menfaat sahibi, hak sahibine kar\u015f\u0131 fiillerinin tecav\u00fcz te\u015fkil etmedi\u011fine karar verilmesi talebiyle dava a\u00e7abilir. Bildirimin yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131lacak davada dava \u015fart\u0131 olarak aranmaz. Bu dava, kendisine kar\u015f\u0131 tecav\u00fcz davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lamaz.
\n(2) Birinci f\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, sicile kay\u0131tl\u0131 t\u00fcm hak sahiplerine tebli\u011f edilir.
\n(3) Birinci f\u0131kra uyar\u0131nca a\u00e7\u0131lan dava, h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fczl\u00fck davas\u0131yla birlikte de a\u00e7\u0131labilir.
\n(4) Mahkeme, 99 uncu maddenin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc veya yedinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ile 143\u2019\u00fcnc\u00fc maddenin onuncu veya on ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan yay\u0131mdan \u00f6nce, \u00f6ne s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddialar\u0131n ge\u00e7erlili\u011fine ili\u015fkin olarak karar veremez.\u201d
\nh\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc amirdir.<\/p>\n
Patentler y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, 551 say\u0131l\u0131 Patentlerin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname ile hukukumuza giren bu d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar, nitelikleri itibar\u0131yla bir tespit davas\u0131d\u0131r. Tespit davas\u0131 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanununun 106. Maddesinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Madde;
\n\u201c(1) Tespit davas\u0131 yoluyla, mahkemeden, bir hakk\u0131n veya hukuki ili\u015fkinin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ya da yoklu\u011funun yahut bir belgenin sahte olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirlenmesi talep edilir.
\n(2) Tespit davas\u0131 a\u00e7an\u0131n, kanunlarda belirtilen istisnai durumlar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, bu davay\u0131 a\u00e7makta hukuken korunmaya de\u011fer g\u00fcncel bir yarar\u0131 bulunmal\u0131d\u0131r.
\n(3) Maddi vak\u0131alar, tek ba\u015flar\u0131na tespit davas\u0131n\u0131n konusunu olu\u015fturamaz.\u201d
\nH\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc amirdir.<\/p>\n
Son d\u00f6nemde verilen baz\u0131 mahkeme kararlar\u0131nda, patente tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti davas\u0131nda, yarg\u0131lama giderinin davac\u0131 \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, vekalet \u00fccretine de h\u00fckmedilmedi\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, bu yaz\u0131mda bu hususu tart\u0131\u015fma gere\u011fi duydum.<\/p>\n
Bir ilk derece mahkemesi karar\u0131nda,
\n\u201c1. Davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile davac\u0131 \u2026. taraf\u0131ndan daval\u0131 \u2026 aleyhine a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile davac\u0131n\u0131n \u2026.. \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn\u00fcn ve fiillerinin daval\u0131 ad\u0131na tescilli \u2026.. say\u0131l\u0131 patentine tecav\u00fcz etmedi\u011finin tespitine,
\n2. Yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin davac\u0131 \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na,
\n3. Yat\u0131r\u0131lan pe\u015fin harc\u0131n mahsubu ile kalan \u2026 TL pe\u015fin harc\u0131n davac\u0131dan tahsili hazineye irat kayd\u0131na,
\n4. Davac\u0131 lehine, davan\u0131n niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi vekalet \u00fccreti takdirine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,
\n\u2026..\u201d<\/p>\n
\u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmu\u015ftur. Bu karar, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde gerek\u00e7elendirilmi\u015ftir:
\n\u201cAyr\u0131ca, daval\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na sebebiyet vermedi\u011fi, daval\u0131 ad\u0131na tescilli patentin olmas\u0131 nedeniyle bir anlamda daval\u0131n\u0131n yasal has\u0131m niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek davac\u0131 lehine yarg\u0131lama gideri ve vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/p>\n
S\u00f6z konusu karar vekalet \u00fccreti ve yarg\u0131lama giderleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnden istinaf edilmi\u015f ve karar\u0131n bu y\u00f6n\u00fcyle hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, gerek\u00e7eleri ile a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi istinaf talebini a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki gerek\u00e7e ile kabul etmi\u015ftir:
\n\u201cDava, dava t\u00fcrleri i\u00e7eresinde tan\u0131mlanan menfi tespit davas\u0131 niteli\u011finde olmay\u0131p, daval\u0131n\u0131n bir eyleminin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sadece davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a a\u00e7\u0131lan tespit h\u00fckm\u00fc i\u00e7eren bir dava oldu\u011fu, 551 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK 149. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f tespit davas\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, davac\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7makta ilgili madde h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fi hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.
\n6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK\u2019n\u0131n 326. maddesinin (1). bendinde \u201cKanunda yaz\u0131l\u0131 haller d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin aleyhine h\u00fck\u00fcm verilen taraftan al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilir\u201d, (2). bendinde ise \u201cdavada iki taraftan her biri k\u0131smen hakl\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karsa mahkeme yarg\u0131lama giderlerini hakl\u0131l\u0131k oran\u0131na g\u00f6re payla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131r.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fc yer almaktad\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 kanunun 312. maddesinde ise \u201c… kabul beyan\u0131nda bulunan taraf davada aleyhine h\u00fck\u00fcm verilmi\u015f gibi yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demeye mahkum edilir, daval\u0131 davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na kendi hal ve davran\u0131\u015f\u0131 ile sebebiyet vermemi\u015f ve yarg\u0131laman\u0131n ilk duru\u015fmas\u0131nda da davac\u0131n\u0131n talep sonucunu kabul etmi\u015f ise yarg\u0131lama giderlerini \u00f6demeye mahkum edilemez.\u201d denilmektedir.
\nBu bilgiler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda somut olay incelendi\u011finde; davac\u0131n\u0131n eldeki davay\u0131 a\u00e7makta 551 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK 149. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca hukuki yarar\u0131n\u0131n oldu\u011fu ve davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131na daval\u0131n\u0131n sebebiyet vermemi\u015f ise de, daval\u0131n\u0131n dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra davay\u0131 kabul etmeyerek yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fi ve cevap dilek\u00e7esinde kendisi hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini talep etti\u011fi, bu nedenle HMK\u2019nun 312\/son maddesindeki ko\u015fulun mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, HMK’n\u0131n 326. maddesi gere\u011fi yarg\u0131lama giderlerinden daval\u0131n\u0131n sorumlu tutulmas\u0131 gerekirken, davac\u0131n\u0131n sorumlu tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n yerinde olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla istinaf talebinin kabul\u00fcne karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.
\nYukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle mahkemece yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fil ise de; yap\u0131lan bu yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n yeniden yarg\u0131lamay\u0131 gerektirmemesi nedeniyle davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf taleplerinin kabul\u00fcne, ilk derece mahkemesinin karar\u0131n\u0131n 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK 353\/1-b.2 maddesi h\u00fckm\u00fc gere\u011fince kald\u0131r\u0131larak a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki \u015fekilde h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131na karar verilmi\u015ftir.\u201d<\/p>\n
G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere, patente ya da s\u0131nai hakka tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti davalar\u0131nda, s\u0131nai hak sahibi yasal has\u0131m konumunda kabul edilemez. Dava a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra yarg\u0131laman\u0131n s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesi ve davac\u0131n\u0131n yarg\u0131lama gideri yapmas\u0131 halinde, bu yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin davac\u0131 \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131 do\u011fru bir yakla\u015f\u0131m olmay\u0131p, nitekim B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi de bu konuya a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131k getirmi\u015f ve mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc halinde, davac\u0131 lehine yarg\u0131lama giderleri ile vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fi konusunda h\u00fck\u00fcm olu\u015fturmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n
Av. Samiye EYUBO\u011eLU<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
PATENTE TECAV\u00dcZ\u00dcN OLMADI\u011eININ TESP\u0130T\u0130 DAVASINDA YERGILAMA G\u0130DER\u0130 VE VEKALET \u00dcCRET\u0130 Patente tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti davas\u0131, hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 6769 say\u0131l\u0131 S\u0131nai M\u00fclkiyet Kanununun 154. Maddesinden almaktad\u0131r. Madde; \u201c(1) Menfaati olan herkes, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de giri\u015fti\u011fi veya giri\u015fece\u011fi ticari veya s\u0131nai faaliyetin ya da bu ama\u00e7la yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ciddi ve fiili giri\u015fimlerin s\u0131nai m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131na tecav\u00fcz te\u015fkil edip etmedi\u011fi […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[10],"tags":[13],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eyuboglu.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1175"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eyuboglu.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eyuboglu.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eyuboglu.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eyuboglu.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1175"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.eyuboglu.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1175\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1197,"href":"https:\/\/www.eyuboglu.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1175\/revisions\/1197"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.eyuboglu.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eyuboglu.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.eyuboglu.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}